Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm XP200
Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm XP200 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR1000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Launched September 2012
Fujifilm XP200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Released March 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm XP200 Overview
Let's look closer at the Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm XP200, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. The resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR1000 was revealed 5 months before the Fujifilm XP200 and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-ZR1000 matches up versus the Fujifilm XP200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm XP200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 and Fujifilm FinePix XP200. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery and Fujifilm XP200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Fujifilm XP200
| EX-ZR1000 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
| Fujifilm XP200 | EX-ZR1000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 461k | Clearer screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Fujifilm XP200
| EX-ZR1000 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2012 |  | March 2013 | Same generation |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm XP200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR1000 provides external measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) while the Fujifilm XP200 has proportions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm XP200 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR1000 and the Fujifilm XP200.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR1000 and Fujifilm XP200 is 90 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm XP200 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to see the gap in sensor dimensions simply by going through specifications. The picture below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR1000 and Fujifilm XP200.
Plainly, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size and the exact same MP and you should expect comparable quality of photos although you would want to take the release date of the cameras into account.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm XP200 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Portrait photography details
Fujifilm XP200 Portrait photography details
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
offers face detection focus
can't use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
good resolution (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 as a Street photography camera
Fujifilm XP200 as a Street photography camera
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (255 grams)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Sports photography advice
Fujifilm XP200 Sports photography advice
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
good battery life (470 shots)
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16MP)
features tracking focus
weather proofing
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Travel photography factors
Fujifilm XP200 Travel photography factors
good battery life (470 CIPA)
lighter than competitors in class (255g)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
fairly wide (24mm)
great zoom (300mm)
no Timelapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
weather proofing
good resolution (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse function
does not have selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 as a Landscape photography camera
Fujifilm XP200 as a Landscape photography camera
has manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
good battery life (470 shots)
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
no Timelapse recording
quite wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
weather proofing
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
lack of manual exposure
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
lack of Timelapse function
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Vlogging information
Fujifilm XP200 Vlogging information
fairly wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors in class (255 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
no external microphone support
quite wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
does not have selfie friendly display
lack of microphone port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm XP200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2012-09-25 | 2013-03-22 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.9-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 255 gr (0.56 lbs) | 232 gr (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | NP-50A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $572 | $250 |