Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak Sport
90 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
92 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak Sport Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Introduced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak Sport Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Kodak Sport, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Kodak. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and Sport (12MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR1000 was launched 21 months after the Sport making them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the EX-ZR1000 matches up versus the Sport in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak Sport Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 and Kodak EasyShare Sport. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery and Kodak Sport Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Kodak Sport
| EX-ZR1000 | Sport | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2012 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 21 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.6") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 112k | Clearer display (+349k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Sport over the Casio EX-ZR1000
| Sport | EX-ZR1000 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Kodak Sport
| EX-ZR1000 | Sport | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak Sport Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR1000 provides external measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Kodak Sport has dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Kodak Sport in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR1000 vs the Sport.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR1000 and Sport is 90 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak Sport Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions only by checking out technical specs. The pic here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR1000 and Sport.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should expect to see the Casio EX-ZR1000 to produce extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR1000 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak Sport Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak Sport Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Kodak EasyShare Sport | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Kodak EasyShare Sport |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2012-09-25 | 2011-01-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1250 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.4 inches |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 112 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1400s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 255 grams (0.56 lb) | 175 grams (0.39 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $572 | $155 |
