Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus E-PL9
90 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
85 Imaging
56 Features
78 Overall
64
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus E-PL9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Push to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Announced February 2018
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL8
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus E-PL9 Overview
The following is a in-depth analysis of the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Olympus E-PL9, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the E-PL9 (16MP) is very similar but the EX-ZR1000 (1/2.3") and E-PL9 (Four Thirds) feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe EX-ZR1000 was brought out 6 years earlier than the E-PL9 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR1000 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the EX-ZR1000 grades vs the E-PL9 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus E-PL9 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 & Olympus PEN E-PL9. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery & Olympus E-PL9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Olympus E-PL9
EX-ZR1000 | E-PL9 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
E-PL9 | EX-ZR1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | September 2012 | Newer by 65 months | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 461k | Clearer display (+579k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Olympus E-PL9
EX-ZR1000 | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus E-PL9 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR1000 provides external dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL9 has proportions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") having a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Olympus E-PL9 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR1000 vs the E-PL9.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR1000 and E-PL9 is 90 and 85 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus E-PL9 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading specs. The pic here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR1000 and E-PL9.
All in all, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact resolution but not the same sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR1000 contains the tinier sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower depth of field more challenging. The more aged EX-ZR1000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus E-PL9 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Olympus PEN E-PL9 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-09-25 | 2018-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 121 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 8.6 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 255 grams (0.56 lb) | 380 grams (0.84 lb) |
Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 pictures | 350 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $572 | $599 |