Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS
Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR1000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Announced September 2012
Olympus TG-850 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview
Here is a comprehensive overview of the Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the TG-850 iHS (16MP) is fairly close and both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR1000 was released 16 months before the TG-850 iHS making them a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the EX-ZR1000 grades versus the TG-850 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery & Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
| EX-ZR1000 | TG-850 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Casio EX-ZR1000
| TG-850 iHS | EX-ZR1000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | September 2012 | Fresher by 16 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Olympus TG-850 iHS
| EX-ZR1000 | TG-850 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Tilting | Tilting display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR1000 comes with outside measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) while the Olympus TG-850 iHS has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR1000 compared to the TG-850 iHS.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR1000 and TG-850 iHS is 90 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing only by looking through technical specs. The photograph underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR1000 and TG-850 iHS.
As you can tell, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the identical resolution therefore you can expect comparable quality of images though you may want to take the launch date of the cameras into account. The older EX-ZR1000 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-ZR1000
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-850 iHS
you can focus manually
MP count good (16 megapixels)
has face detect focusing
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
provides face detection focus
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Street photography factors
Olympus TG-850 iHS Street photography factors
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (255g)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Optical)
weather proof
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Sports photography factors
Olympus TG-850 iHS Sports photography factors
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16MP)
has tracking focus
great battery life (470 per charge)
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames/s)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
weather proof
better than average battery power (330 per charge)
no shutter priority
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Travel photography features
Olympus TG-850 iHS Travel photography features
great battery life (470 shots)
lighter than competition in class (255 grams)
MP count good (16MP)
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
missing Time Lapse function
does not have selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.0)
better than average battery power (330 per charge)
weather proof
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (21mm)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Landscape photography information
Olympus TG-850 iHS Landscape photography information
you can focus manually
fairly wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16MP)
great battery life (470 per charge)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
missing Time Lapse function
rather wide (21mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
weather proof
better than average battery power (330 CIPA)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not available
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Casio EX-ZR1000
Vlogging with Olympus TG-850 iHS
fairly wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focusing
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (255 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
does not have selfie friendly display
missing mic port
rather wide (21mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing external mic port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2012-09-25 | 2014-01-29 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4616 x 3464 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1/2 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 255 gr (0.56 pounds) | 218 gr (0.48 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 images | 330 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $572 | $250 |