Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-M1
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Ricoh WG-M1, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is relatively similar and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR1000 was released 23 months earlier than the WG-M1 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-ZR1000 grades versus the WG-M1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 and Ricoh WG-M1. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Ricoh WG-M1
EX-ZR1000 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 115k | Crisper screen (+346k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
WG-M1 | EX-ZR1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2014 | September 2012 | Newer by 23 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Ricoh WG-M1
EX-ZR1000 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR1000 comes with outer dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has proportions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is a front view size comparison of the EX-ZR1000 vs the WG-M1.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR1000 and WG-M1 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading specifications. The image underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR1000 and WG-M1.
To sum up, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Casio EX-ZR1000 to offer you more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR1000 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2012-09-25 | 2014-09-12 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | (1×) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 1.5 inches |
Display resolution | 461k dots | 115k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 255 gr (0.56 lbs) | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 shots | 350 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $572 | $2,000 |