Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung ST700
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
99 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung ST700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 99 x 55 x 20mm
- Released January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung ST700 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Samsung ST700, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the ST700 (16MP) is fairly similar and they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR1000 was introduced 21 months after the ST700 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR1000 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST700 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the EX-ZR1000 scores versus the ST700 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung ST700 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 and Samsung ST700. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery and Samsung ST700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Samsung ST700
| EX-ZR1000 | ST700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2012 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 21 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST700 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
| ST700 | EX-ZR1000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Samsung ST700
| EX-ZR1000 | ST700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung ST700 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR1000 comes with physical dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) and the Samsung ST700 has dimensions of 99mm x 55mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Samsung ST700 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR1000 and the ST700.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR1000 and ST700 is 90 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung ST700 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to picture the difference between sensor sizes just by going over a spec sheet. The pic here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR1000 and ST700.
Clearly, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same resolution therefore you should expect similar quality of photographs but you should consider the release date of the products into consideration. The newer EX-ZR1000 provides an edge in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung ST700 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung ST700 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Samsung ST700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Samsung ST700 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2012-09-25 | 2011-01-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | - |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | () |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 255 gr (0.56 lb) | - |
| Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 99 x 55 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $572 | $280 |