Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB210
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2011
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB210, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR1000 was introduced 15 months after the WB210 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise view of how the EX-ZR1000 grades against the WB210 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 and Samsung WB210. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery and Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Samsung WB210
EX-ZR1000 | WB210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2012 | July 2011 | More modern by 15 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 1k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
WB210 | EX-ZR1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Samsung WB210
EX-ZR1000 | WB210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR1000 enjoys physical measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB210 has sizing of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB210 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR1000 compared to the WB210.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR1000 and WB210 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes merely by going through specs. The image below may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR1000 and WB210.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You should count on the Casio EX-ZR1000 to show more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a little more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR1000 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Samsung WB210 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Samsung WB210 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2012-09-25 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.9-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
Display resolution | 461k dot | 1k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 255 grams (0.56 lb) | 174 grams (0.38 lb) |
Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 pictures | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $572 | $279 |