Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon A900
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
88 Imaging
45 Features
58 Overall
50
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Announced February 2016
- Replacement is Nikon A1000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon A900 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Casio EX-ZR15 and Nikon A900, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the A900 (20MP) is very close and they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR15 was announced 5 years prior to the A900 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short introduction of how the EX-ZR15 matches up vs the A900 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon A900 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 and Nikon Coolpix A900. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery and Nikon A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Nikon A900
| EX-ZR15 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Casio EX-ZR15
| A900 | EX-ZR15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2016 |  | January 2012 | Fresher by 50 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 461k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Nikon A900
| EX-ZR15 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon A900 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR15 enjoys outer dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Nikon A900 has sizing of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") and a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR15 and Nikon A900 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR15 and the A900.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR15 and A900 is 93 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon A900 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizing only by researching specifications. The visual underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR15 and A900.
To sum up, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Nikon A900 to render more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics far more aggressively. The older EX-ZR15 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon A900 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Nikon Coolpix A900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Nikon |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Nikon Coolpix A900 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2012-01-09 | 2016-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 24-840mm (35.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.4-6.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 7.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 176 gr (0.39 lb) | 289 gr (0.64 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 photos | 300 photos |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-110 | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $249 | $400 |