Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon S9700
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40


90 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon S9700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 232g - 110 x 64 x 35mm
- Released February 2014
- Succeeded the Nikon S9500
- Refreshed by Nikon S9900

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon S9700 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon S9700, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Nikon. The resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the S9700 (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR15 was announced 3 years earlier than the S9700 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the EX-ZR15 matches up vs the S9700 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon S9700 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 and Nikon Coolpix S9700. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery and Nikon S9700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Nikon S9700
EX-ZR15 | S9700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon S9700 over the Casio EX-ZR15
S9700 | EX-ZR15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2012 | More recent by 25 months |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 461k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Nikon S9700
EX-ZR15 | S9700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon S9700 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR15 offers external measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Nikon S9700 has specifications of 110mm x 64mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon S9700 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR15 compared to the S9700.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR15 and S9700 is 93 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon S9700 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to visualize the gap between sensor measurements merely by going over specs. The visual underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR15 and S9700.
All in all, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact megapixels so you should expect similar quality of files but you need to consider the production date of the products into consideration. The older EX-ZR15 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon S9700 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon S9700 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Nikon Coolpix S9700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Nikon |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Nikon Coolpix S9700 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2012-01-09 | 2014-02-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 99 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 25-750mm (30.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.7-6.4 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.20 m | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | TTL auto flash with monitor preflashes |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30/25p, 60/50i) 1280 x 720 (60/50/30/25/15/12.5p) 960 x 540 (30/25p) 640 x 480 (120/30/25p) 320 x 240 (240p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lbs) | 232 grams (0.51 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 110 x 64 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 pictures | 300 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-110 | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $249 | $350 |