Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus E-1
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
59 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus E-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Announced November 2003
- Successor is Olympus E-3
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus E-1 Overview
The following is a complete comparison of the Casio EX-ZR15 and Olympus E-1, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Pro DSLR by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and E-1 (5MP) and the EX-ZR15 (1/2.3") and E-1 (Four Thirds) possess different sensor sizes.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe EX-ZR15 was released 8 years after the E-1 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR15 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera.
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a simple summation of how the EX-ZR15 grades against the E-1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus E-1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Olympus E-1. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Olympus E-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Olympus E-1
| EX-ZR15 | E-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | November 2003 | Newer by 99 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 134k | Sharper screen (+327k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Casio EX-ZR15
| E-1 | EX-ZR15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Olympus E-1
| EX-ZR15 | E-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus E-1 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR15 has got physical dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-1 has proportions of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") and a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR15 and Olympus E-1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the EX-ZR15 compared to the E-1.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR15 and E-1 is 93 and 59 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus E-1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading through specifications. The picture below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR15 and E-1.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR15 due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Casio EX-ZR15 will give you more detail as a result of its extra 11MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR15 should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus E-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus E-1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Olympus E-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Olympus E-1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Pro DSLR |
| Released | 2012-01-09 | 2003-11-29 |
| Body design | Compact | Large SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 5 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2560 x 1920 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 3 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
| Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 45 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 1.8" |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 134 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.48x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 176g (0.39 pounds) | 735g (1.62 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I or II) |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $249 | $1,700 |
