Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
93 Imaging
38 Features
43 Overall
40
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) but they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR15 was revealed within a month of the TG-820 iHS and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief view of how the EX-ZR15 grades versus the TG-820 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| EX-ZR15 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Casio EX-ZR15
| TG-820 iHS | EX-ZR15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 1030k | 461k | Clearer display (+569k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| EX-ZR15 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 | February 2012 | Similar age | |
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR15 offers physical dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Olympus TG-820 iHS has proportions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR15 vs the TG-820 iHS.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR15 and TG-820 iHS is 93 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reviewing specs. The image here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR15 and TG-820 iHS.
All in all, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Casio EX-ZR15 to offer greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2012-01-09 | 2012-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 1,030k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.20 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lb) | 206 grams (0.45 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 photographs | 220 photographs |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-110 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $249 | $500 |