Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-4
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-4, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is pretty close and they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR15 was announced 3 years earlier than the WG-4 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the EX-ZR15 grades against the WG-4 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 and Ricoh WG-4. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Ricoh WG-4
| EX-ZR15 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Casio EX-ZR15
| WG-4 | EX-ZR15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 25 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Ricoh WG-4
| EX-ZR15 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR15 offers outer dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-4 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR15 vs the WG-4.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR15 and WG-4 is 93 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes merely by looking through a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR15 and WG-4.
As you can see, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical MP therefore you should expect comparable quality of photographs but you really should factor the release date of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-ZR15 will be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2012-01-09 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.20 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176 grams (0.39 pounds) | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 images | 240 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-110 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $249 | $330 |