Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40


90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is relatively similar and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR15 was unveiled 3 years earlier than the WG-4 GPS and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summation of how the EX-ZR15 matches up against the WG-4 GPS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
EX-ZR15 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Casio EX-ZR15
WG-4 GPS | EX-ZR15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2012 | Fresher by 25 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
EX-ZR15 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR15 enjoys outside measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is the front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR15 vs the WG-4 GPS.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR15 and WG-4 GPS is 93 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to picture the difference between sensor sizing simply by going over specs. The graphic here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR15 and WG-4 GPS.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical resolution therefore you can expect similar quality of photos although you have to consider the age of the products into consideration. The older EX-ZR15 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2012-01-09 | 2014-02-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 461k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.20 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 176 gr (0.39 lb) | 235 gr (0.52 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 photographs | 240 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-110 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $249 | $210 |