Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-80
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
![Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR15/Casio-EX-ZR15-front.jpg)
![Ricoh WG-80 front Ricoh WG-80 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-WG-80/Ricoh-WG-80-front.jpg)
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched May 2022
- Earlier Model is Ricoh WG-70
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Below is a thorough review of the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Ricoh WG-80, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the WG-80 (16MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
The EX-ZR15 was introduced 11 years prior to the WG-80 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief summary of how the EX-ZR15 scores vs the WG-80 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 and Ricoh WG-80. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery and Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Ricoh WG-80
EX-ZR15 | WG-80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.70" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Casio EX-ZR15
WG-80 | EX-ZR15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2022 | ![]() | January 2012 | More recent by 126 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Ricoh WG-80
EX-ZR15 | WG-80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR15 comes with exterior dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-80 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Ricoh WG-80 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR15 compared to the WG-80.
![Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-80 size comparison Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-80 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR15-vs-Ricoh-WG-80-size-comparison.jpg)
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR15 and WG-80 is 93 and 91 respectively.
![Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-80 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-80 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR15-vs-Ricoh-WG-80-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to see the contrast between sensor measurements just by checking specifications. The visual here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR15 and WG-80.
To sum up, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact megapixels so you should expect similar quality of pictures but you should really take the production date of the products into consideration. The older EX-ZR15 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
![Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-80 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-80 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR15-vs-Ricoh-WG-80-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR15-vs-Ricoh-WG-80-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Ricoh WG-80 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Ricoh WG-80 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2012-01-09 | 2022-05-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.70 inches |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.20 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | On, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 176 gr (0.39 lbs) | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 photographs | 300 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-110 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $249 | $300 |