Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST600
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
95 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST600 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-135mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 150g - 104 x 60 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST600 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST600, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the ST600 (14MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR15 was released 2 years after the ST600 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR15 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST600 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the EX-ZR15 matches up vs the ST600 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST600 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Samsung ST600. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Samsung ST600 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Samsung ST600
EX-ZR15 | ST600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | January 2010 | More modern by 25 months | |
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST600 over the Casio EX-ZR15
ST600 | EX-ZR15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1152k | 461k | Crisper display (+691k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Samsung ST600
EX-ZR15 | ST600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST600 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR15 provides external dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST600 has measurements of 104mm x 60mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST600 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR15 against the ST600.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR15 and ST600 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST600 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading through a spec sheet. The pic below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR15 and ST600.
Clearly, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR15 to give extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR15 should have an edge in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST600 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST600 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung ST600 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung ST600 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2012-01-09 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 27-135mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 1,152 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.20 m | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 176g (0.39 lb) | 150g (0.33 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 104 x 60 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-110 | SLB07 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $249 | $330 |