Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST90
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40


99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST90 Overview
Below is a extended overview of the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST90, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the ST90 (14MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR15 was manufactured 12 months later than the ST90 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR15 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST90 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple view of how the EX-ZR15 matches up vs the ST90 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST90 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 and Samsung ST90. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery and Samsung ST90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Samsung ST90
EX-ZR15 | ST90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | ![]() | January 2011 | More recent by 12 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST90 over the Casio EX-ZR15
ST90 | EX-ZR15 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Samsung ST90
EX-ZR15 | ST90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST90 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR15 offers physical dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST90 has proportions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST90 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR15 versus the ST90.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR15 and ST90 is 93 and 99 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST90 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to see the difference between sensor measurements only by looking at technical specs. The graphic here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR15 and ST90.
As you can tell, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Casio EX-ZR15 to resolve more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR15 will have an advantage in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST90 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST90 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung ST90 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung ST90 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2012-01-09 | 2011-01-19 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | - |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | () |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.20 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lbs) | - |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-110 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $249 | $150 |