Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST93
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
97 Imaging
39 Features
20 Overall
31
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST93 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Released April 2011
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST93 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Samsung ST93, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the ST93 (16MP) is fairly well matched and they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR15 was unveiled 9 months after the ST93 which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR15 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST93 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving through a thorough comparison, below is a simple summary of how the EX-ZR15 grades vs the ST93 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST93 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 and Samsung ST93. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery and Samsung ST93 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Samsung ST93
EX-ZR15 | ST93 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2012 | April 2011 | More modern by 9 months | |
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST93 over the Casio EX-ZR15
ST93 | EX-ZR15 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Samsung ST93
EX-ZR15 | ST93 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST93 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR15 offers physical measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST93 has sizing of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Samsung ST93 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR15 and the ST93.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR15 and ST93 is 93 and 97 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST93 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes just by looking at technical specs. The picture here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR15 and ST93.
As you can tell, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical megapixels therefore you should expect similar quality of files although you should always take the release date of the products into consideration. The more recent EX-ZR15 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST93 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST93 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung ST93 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung ST93 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2012-01-09 | 2011-04-20 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | () |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.20 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 176g (0.39 lbs) | 110g (0.24 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-110 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $249 | - |