Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung TL350
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Alternate Name is WB2000
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung TL350, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and TL350 (10MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR15 was brought out 23 months after the TL350 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple overview of how the EX-ZR15 scores vs the TL350 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Samsung TL350. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Samsung TL350
| EX-ZR15 | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 23 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Casio EX-ZR15
| TL350 | EX-ZR15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 461k | Crisper screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Samsung TL350
| EX-ZR15 | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR15 has got exterior measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Samsung TL350 has proportions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung TL350 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR15 vs the TL350.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR15 and TL350 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes simply by checking a spec sheet. The pic here might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR15 and TL350.
Clearly, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR15 to give you greater detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR15 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung TL350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung TL350 |
| Also Known as | - | WB2000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-01-09 | 2010-02-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.4-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.20 m | 5.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lb) | 195 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-110 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $249 | $400 |