Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung TL350
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Alternate Name is WB2000
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung TL350, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and TL350 (10MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-ZR15 was brought out 23 months after the TL350 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple overview of how the EX-ZR15 scores vs the TL350 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Samsung TL350. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Samsung TL350
| EX-ZR15 | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 | February 2010 | More modern by 23 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Casio EX-ZR15
| TL350 | EX-ZR15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k | 461k | Crisper screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Samsung TL350
| EX-ZR15 | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR15 has got exterior measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Samsung TL350 has proportions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung TL350 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR15 vs the TL350.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR15 and TL350 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes simply by checking a spec sheet. The pic here might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR15 and TL350.
Clearly, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR15 to give you greater detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR15 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung TL350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung TL350 |
| Also Known as | - | WB2000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-01-09 | 2010-02-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.4-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.20 m | 5.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lb) | 195 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-110 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $249 | $400 |