Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB350F
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40


90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Announced January 2014

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Following is a in depth comparison of the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Samsung WB350F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is very similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR15 was brought out 24 months earlier than the WB350F making them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-ZR15 matches up vs the WB350F for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Samsung WB350F. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Samsung WB350F
EX-ZR15 | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Casio EX-ZR15
WB350F | EX-ZR15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | ![]() | January 2012 | More modern by 24 months |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Samsung WB350F
EX-ZR15 | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR15 enjoys physical dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Samsung WB350F has sizing of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Samsung WB350F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR15 versus the WB350F.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR15 and WB350F is 93 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading a spec sheet. The image underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR15 and WB350F.
As you can see, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size and the identical megapixels and you can expect similar quality of photographs however you should take the launch date of the products into consideration. The more aged EX-ZR15 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung WB350F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung WB350F |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2012-01-09 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.20 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 176g (0.39 pounds) | 276g (0.61 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-110 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $249 | $260 |