Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma SD9
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Announced November 2002
- Successor is Sigma SD10
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Casio EX-ZR15 and Sigma SD9, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Casio and Sigma. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the EX-ZR15 (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) have different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR15 was unveiled 9 years later than the SD9 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR15 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the EX-ZR15 matches up vs the SD9 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Sigma SD9. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Sigma SD9
EX-ZR15 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2012 | November 2002 | More recent by 112 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
Display resolution | 461k | 130k | Crisper display (+331k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Casio EX-ZR15
SD9 | EX-ZR15 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Sigma SD9
EX-ZR15 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR15 has outside dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Sigma SD9 has measurements of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") along with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR15 and Sigma SD9 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR15 vs the SD9.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR15 and SD9 is 93 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor measurements only by going through specs. The photograph underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR15 and SD9.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-ZR15 having a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Casio EX-ZR15 will provide more detail having an extra 13 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR15 should have an edge in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Sigma |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Sigma SD9 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2012-01-09 | 2002-11-26 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 3 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2268 x 1512 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 1.8 inches |
Resolution of display | 461k dots | 130k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.20 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lbs) | 950 grams (2.09 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 images | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-110 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $249 | $3,001 |