Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sony a3500
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45935/45935cd57d74e35c1f19875df2e85c33ee5d58cd" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a8dd/4a8dd561f31a1ef05032a3f55300768a5c6ad484" alt="Sony Alpha a3500 front Sony Alpha a3500 front"
69 Imaging
63 Features
54 Overall
59
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sony a3500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
- Introduced March 2014
- Previous Model is Sony A3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sony a3500 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Sony a3500, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Casio and Sony. The resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the a3500 (20MP) is relatively similar but the EX-ZR15 (1/2.3") and a3500 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The EX-ZR15 was released 3 years prior to the a3500 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR15 being a Compact camera and the Sony a3500 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short highlight of how the EX-ZR15 grades versus the a3500 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sony a3500 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Sony Alpha a3500. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Sony a3500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Sony a3500
EX-ZR15 | a3500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony a3500 over the Casio EX-ZR15
a3500 | EX-ZR15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2014 | ![]() | January 2012 | Newer by 26 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Sony a3500
EX-ZR15 | a3500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sony a3500 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR15 has got outside dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Sony a3500 has dimensions of 128mm x 91mm x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") and a weight of 411 grams (0.91 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Sony a3500 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR15 compared to the a3500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32660/32660a52f4f45db0657a962ec5a1f8bd36ffa009" alt="Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sony a3500 size comparison Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sony a3500 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR15 and a3500 is 93 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b8de/5b8de27652ae2e9fb770e2eca886a61cbf91a18b" alt="Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sony a3500 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sony a3500 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sony a3500 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing technical specs. The image here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR15 and a3500.
As you have seen, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR15 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony a3500 will deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR15 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4cf0b/4cf0bed1993131f0ce95a2b8f1bd52e927997d39" alt="Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sony a3500 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sony a3500 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sony a3500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67c55/67c55ff6c48cc925597441e999c951cb3e6984f4" alt="Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sony a3500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sony a3500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sony a3500 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Sony Alpha a3500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Sony |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Sony Alpha a3500 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2012-01-09 | 2014-03-21 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | BIONZ image |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5456 x 3632 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 16000 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.47x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.20 m | 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync. |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 176 gr (0.39 pounds) | 411 gr (0.91 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 photographs | 470 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-110 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $249 | $398 |