Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sony TX200V
Portability
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Portability
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR15
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Released January 2012
Sony TX200V
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed January 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sony TX200V Overview
Following is a extended overview of the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Sony TX200V, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Sony. The image resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the TX200V (18MP) is relatively close and they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR15 was brought out very close to the TX200V so they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR15 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise summation of how the EX-ZR15 matches up against the TX200V with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Sony TX200V
| EX-ZR15 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Casio EX-ZR15
| TX200V | EX-ZR15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3.3" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 461k | Clearer screen (+769k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Sony TX200V
| EX-ZR15 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | January 2012 | Same age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR15 provides exterior dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Sony TX200V has sizing of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Sony TX200V in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR15 vs the TX200V.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR15 and TX200V is 93 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes just by looking through specifications. The image underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR15 and TX200V.
Plainly, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Sony TX200V to provide you with more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 Portrait photography info
Sony TX200V Portrait photography info
focusing manually
good megapixels (16MP)
comes with face detection autofocus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
decent MP (18MP)
offers face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Street photography with Casio EX-ZR15
Street photography with Sony TX200V
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides focus by touch
weather proof
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 Sports photography highlights
Sony TX200V Sports photography highlights
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
better than average battery power (325 per charge)
low frames per second (3.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (18 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
weather proof
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 as a Travel photography camera
Sony TX200V as a Travel photography camera
better than average battery power (325 per charge)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
quite wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
weather proof
provides focus by touch
decent MP (18MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse function
does not posses selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 Landscape photography features
Sony TX200V Landscape photography features
focusing manually
quite wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
better than average battery power (325 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
missing Time Lapse function
pretty wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3.3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (18 megapixels)
weather proof
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
lack of Timelapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 Vlogging highlights
Sony TX200V Vlogging highlights
quite wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
missing external mic socket
pretty wide (28mm)
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
lack of external microphone socket
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2012-01-09 | 2012-01-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3.3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 1,230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.20 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176 gr (0.39 lbs) | 129 gr (0.28 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 shots | 220 shots |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-110 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $249 | $500 |
