Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Z950
92 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Z950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Launched June 2010
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Z950 Overview
Let's look closer at the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Kodak Z950, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Kodak. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and Z950 (12MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or MThe EX-ZR300 was manufactured 24 months after the Z950 which makes them a generation away from each other. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the EX-ZR300 matches up against the Z950 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Z950 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Kodak EasyShare Z950. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Kodak Z950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Kodak Z950
EX-ZR300 | Z950 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2012 | June 2010 | More modern by 24 months | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Casio EX-ZR300
Z950 | EX-ZR300 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Kodak Z950
EX-ZR300 | Z950 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Z950 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR300 has outside measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Kodak Z950 has measurements of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Kodak Z950 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR300 versus the Z950.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR300 and Z950 is 92 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Z950 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes only by researching a spec sheet. The image underneath may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR300 and Z950.
As you can see, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR300 to result in greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR300 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Z950 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Z950 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Kodak |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Kodak EasyShare Z950 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2012-05-22 | 2010-06-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 6cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 1/8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1250s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205g (0.45 pounds) | 243g (0.54 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | KLIC-7003 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $329 | $250 |