Clicky

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
50
Overall
44
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 front
 
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 front
Portability
65
Imaging
46
Features
56
Overall
50

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR300
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
  • Revealed May 2012
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
(Full Review)
  • 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Overview

Let's look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Casio and Kodak. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The EX-ZR300 was announced 19 months earlier than the Astro Zoom AZ651 which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR300 being a Compact camera and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-ZR300 matches up versus the Astro Zoom AZ651 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

 EX-ZR300 Astro Zoom AZ651 

Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Casio EX-ZR300

 Astro Zoom AZ651 EX-ZR300 
IntroducedJanuary 2014May 2012More modern by 19 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution920k461kCrisper screen (+459k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

 EX-ZR300 Astro Zoom AZ651 
Manual focus Dial exact focus
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurement
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR300 comes with physical dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 has measurements of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") and a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs).

See the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR300 vs the Astro Zoom AZ651.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR300 and Astro Zoom AZ651 is 92 and 65 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes only by researching specifications. The image here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR300 and Astro Zoom AZ651.

Plainly, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to render greater detail with its extra 5MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR300 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 as a Portrait photography camera
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 as a Portrait photography camera
40
focusing manually
MP count good (16MP)
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
54
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (21MP)
includes face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 as a Street photography camera
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 as a Street photography camera
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (205g)
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
59
screen articulates fully
has image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition (567g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-ZR300
Sports photography with Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
55
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16MP)
has tracking focus
good battery pack (500 shots)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
51
amazing zoom range (24-1560mm 65.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (21 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 Travel photography advice
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Travel photography advice
71
good battery pack (500 shots)
lighter than competitors (205g)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
60
sensor resolution is decent (21 megapixels)
built-in flash
selfie friendly screen
pretty wide (24mm)
long reach (1560mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition (567 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 as a Landscape photography camera
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 as a Landscape photography camera
52
focusing manually
fairly wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16MP)
good battery pack (500 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
lack of Time Lapse mode
54
you can focus manually
pretty wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (21 megapixels)
exports RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 Vlogging information
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Vlogging information
33
fairly wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors (205 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of mic port
60
pretty wide (24mm)
selfie friendly screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
doesn't have external microphone jack
more heavy than competition (567 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR300 and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR300Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651
General Information
Company Casio Kodak
Model type Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2012-05-22 2014-01-07
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Chip Exilim Engine HS -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 21 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 5184 x 3888
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points - 25
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) 24-1560mm (65.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/2.9-6.5
Macro focusing distance 1cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 461k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15 seconds -
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 9.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.70 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 1920 x 1080
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format H.264 -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 205 grams (0.45 lb) 567 grams (1.25 lb)
Physical dimensions 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 photos -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID NP-130 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC -
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $329 $419