Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
92 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
65 Imaging
46 Features
56 Overall
50
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed May 2012
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Introduced January 2014
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Casio and Kodak. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-ZR300 was announced 19 months earlier than the Astro Zoom AZ651 which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR300 being a Compact camera and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-ZR300 matches up versus the Astro Zoom AZ651 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 and Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
EX-ZR300 | Astro Zoom AZ651 |
---|
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Casio EX-ZR300
Astro Zoom AZ651 | EX-ZR300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | May 2012 | More modern by 19 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 461k | Crisper screen (+459k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
EX-ZR300 | Astro Zoom AZ651 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR300 comes with physical dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 has measurements of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") and a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR300 vs the Astro Zoom AZ651.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR300 and Astro Zoom AZ651 is 92 and 65 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes only by researching specifications. The image here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR300 and Astro Zoom AZ651.
Plainly, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to render greater detail with its extra 5MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR300 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Kodak |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2012-05-22 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 21 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-1560mm (65.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 461k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | 567 grams (1.25 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $329 | $419 |