Clicky

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S5200

Portability
92
Imaging
39
Features
50
Overall
43
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 front
 
Nikon Coolpix S5200 front
Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
26
Overall
33

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S5200 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR300
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
  • Launched May 2012
Nikon S5200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 3200
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-156mm (F) lens
  • 146g - 98 x 58 x 22mm
  • Announced January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S5200 Overview

On this page, we are evaluating the Casio EX-ZR300 and Nikon S5200, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Nikon. The image resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the S5200 (16MP) is fairly similar and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The EX-ZR300 was introduced 8 months prior to the S5200 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the EX-ZR300 scores against the S5200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Nikon S5200

 EX-ZR300 S5200 
Manually focus More accurate focus
Display resolution461k460kCrisper display (+1k dot)

Reasons to pick Nikon S5200 over the Casio EX-ZR300

 S5200 EX-ZR300 
AnnouncedJanuary 2013May 2012More recent by 8 months

Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Nikon S5200

 EX-ZR300 S5200 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display size
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S5200 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR300 provides physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Nikon S5200 has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs).

Contrast the Casio EX-ZR300 and Nikon S5200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR300 and the S5200.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S5200 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR300 and S5200 is 92 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S5200 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S5200 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be tough to visualize the difference between sensor measurements only by going over a spec sheet. The visual below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR300 and S5200.

As you can see, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same resolution therefore you can expect similar quality of photos but you will need to consider the launch date of the products into consideration. The older EX-ZR300 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S5200 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S5200 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S5200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 Portrait photography highlights
Nikon S5200 Portrait photography highlights
39
manual focus
MP count decent (16MP)
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
30
MP count good (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 Street photography info
Nikon S5200 Street photography info
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (205 grams)
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
48
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 Sports photography info
Nikon S5200 Sports photography info
55
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
great battery (500 CIPA)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
27
MP count good (16MP)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (160 per charge)
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR300
Travel photography with Nikon S5200
71
great battery (500 per charge)
lighter than competition (205 grams)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
great zoom (300mm)
missing Timelapse mode
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
68
MP count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (26mm)
good max aperture (f)
missing Timelapse recording
bad battery pack (160 shots)
display isn't selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 Landscape photography information
Nikon S5200 Landscape photography information
52
manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
great battery (500 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
missing Timelapse mode
41
decently wide (26mm)
good max aperture (f)
screen size is good (3")
MP count good (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
bad battery pack (160 shots)
missing Timelapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 Vlogging highlights
Nikon S5200 Vlogging highlights
33
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (205g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
missing microphone jack
32
decently wide (26mm)
good max aperture (f)
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
missing microphone jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S5200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR300 and Nikon S5200
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR300Nikon Coolpix S5200
General Information
Brand Casio Nikon
Model Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 Nikon Coolpix S5200
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2012-05-22 2013-01-29
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Exilim Engine HS -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 125
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) 26-156mm (6.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.0-5.9 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 461k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech Super Clear TFT color LCD TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 15 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.70 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 1920 x 1080
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format H.264 -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 205 gr (0.45 lbs) 146 gr (0.32 lbs)
Physical dimensions 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") 98 x 58 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 images 160 images
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-130 EN-EL19
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Retail price $329 $130