Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S8100
92 Imaging
38 Features
50 Overall
42
93 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S8100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 30-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 180g - 104 x 60 x 30mm
- Released September 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S8100 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S8100, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Nikon. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and S8100 (12MP) but they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR300 was revealed 21 months after the S8100 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the EX-ZR300 grades vs the S8100 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S8100 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Nikon Coolpix S8100. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Nikon S8100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Nikon S8100
| EX-ZR300 | S8100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2012 |  | September 2010 | Newer by 21 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon S8100 over the Casio EX-ZR300
| S8100 | EX-ZR300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 461k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Nikon S8100
| EX-ZR300 | S8100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S8100 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR300 has got physical dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Nikon S8100 has sizing of 104mm x 60mm x 30mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S8100 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR300 vs the S8100.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR300 and S8100 is 92 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S8100 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions just by going through a spec sheet. The image here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR300 and S8100.
Clearly, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR300 to provide more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR300 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S8100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S8100 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Nikon Coolpix S8100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Nikon |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Nikon Coolpix S8100 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-05-22 | 2010-09-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | Expeed C2 |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 160 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 30-300mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) | 180 grams (0.40 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 104 x 60 x 30mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | 220 pictures |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (10 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $329 | $299 |