Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S9500
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43


92 Imaging
42 Features
37 Overall
40
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S9500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-550mm (F) lens
- 205g - 110 x 60 x 31mm
- Released January 2013
- Replaced the Nikon S9300
- Refreshed by Nikon S9700

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S9500 Overview
Below is a in depth comparison of the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Nikon S9500, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Casio and Nikon. The image resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the S9500 (18MP) is pretty similar and both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR300 was introduced 8 months earlier than the S9500 and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-ZR300 scores vs the S9500 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S9500 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Nikon Coolpix S9500. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Nikon S9500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Nikon S9500
EX-ZR300 | S9500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon S9500 over the Casio EX-ZR300
S9500 | EX-ZR300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | ![]() | May 2012 | More recent by 8 months |
Screen resolution | 614k | ![]() | 461k | Clearer screen (+153k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Nikon S9500
EX-ZR300 | S9500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S9500 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR300 offers exterior measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Nikon S9500 has specifications of 110mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Nikon S9500 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR300 and the S9500.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR300 and S9500 is 92 and 92 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S9500 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements merely by going over specs. The photograph below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR300 and S9500.
All in all, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Nikon S9500 to offer you greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older EX-ZR300 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S9500 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S9500 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Nikon Coolpix S9500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Nikon |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Nikon Coolpix S9500 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2012-05-22 | 2013-01-29 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 99 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-550mm (22.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 461k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | OLED monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 7.5 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 110 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | 230 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $329 | $230 |