Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-5010
92 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
96 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-5010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-180mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 130g - 96 x 57 x 21mm
- Launched January 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-5010 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-5010, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Olympus. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and FE-5010 (12MP) but both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR300 was launched 3 years later than the FE-5010 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a brief summary of how the EX-ZR300 scores vs the FE-5010 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-5010 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 and Olympus FE-5010. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery and Olympus FE-5010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Olympus FE-5010
| EX-ZR300 | FE-5010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2012 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 42 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5010 over the Casio EX-ZR300
| FE-5010 | EX-ZR300 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Olympus FE-5010
| EX-ZR300 | FE-5010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-5010 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR300 comes with outer measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Olympus FE-5010 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-5010 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR300 against the FE-5010.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR300 and FE-5010 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-5010 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing purely by researching technical specs. The photograph here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR300 and FE-5010.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Casio EX-ZR300 to result in greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR300 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-5010 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-5010 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Olympus FE-5010 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Olympus FE-5010 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-05-22 | 2009-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 36-180mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 lb) | 130g (0.29 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 96 x 57 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD-Picture Card (1GB, 2GB), microSD (MASD-1 is required) |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $329 | $130 |
