Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus TG-810
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Portability
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus TG-810 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched May 2012
Olympus TG-810
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed August 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus TG-810 Overview
Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Olympus TG-810, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the TG-810 (14MP) is fairly similar and they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-ZR300 was revealed 10 months later than the TG-810 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a short summation of how the EX-ZR300 scores versus the TG-810 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus TG-810 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Olympus TG-810. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Olympus TG-810 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Olympus TG-810
| EX-ZR300 | TG-810 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2012 |  | August 2011 | More recent by 10 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Casio EX-ZR300
| TG-810 | EX-ZR300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 461k | Sharper display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Olympus TG-810
| EX-ZR300 | TG-810 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus TG-810 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR300 has got outer dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-810 has sizing of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Olympus TG-810 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR300 compared to the TG-810.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR300 and TG-810 is 92 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus TG-810 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements only by reviewing specs. The photograph underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR300 and TG-810.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR300 to deliver more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR300 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Portrait photography details
Olympus TG-810 Portrait photography details
focusing manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
has face detection focusing
no manual focus
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 as a Street photography camera
Olympus TG-810 as a Street photography camera
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (205g)
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Sports photography factors
Olympus TG-810 Sports photography factors
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
good battery life (500 shots)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
has tracking autofocus
environment proofing
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
low battery life (220 per charge)
no phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR300
Travel photography with Olympus TG-810
good battery life (500 shots)
lighter than others in class (205g)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
very long reach (300mm)
lack of Timelapse function
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
environment proofing
MP count decent (14MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
low battery life (220 CIPA)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.9)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Landscape photography factors
Olympus TG-810 Landscape photography factors
focusing manually
fairly wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
good battery life (500 CIPA)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
lack of Timelapse function
pretty wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
environment proofing
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
no manual exposure
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
low battery life (220 CIPA)
does not have Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-810 as a Vlogging camera
fairly wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others in class (205 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of microphone port
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focusing
slow max aperture (f3.9)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external mic jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus TG-810 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Olympus TG-810 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Olympus TG-810 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2012-05-22 | 2011-08-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) | 215 grams (0.47 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | 220 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $329 | $428 |