Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SL30
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
95 Imaging
33 Features
14 Overall
25
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SL30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released May 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 140g - 94 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Alternate Name is ES15
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SL30 Overview
Below is a thorough review of the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Samsung SL30, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and SL30 (10MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR300 was announced 3 years later than the SL30 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the EX-ZR300 matches up against the SL30 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SL30 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Samsung SL30. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Samsung SL30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Samsung SL30
| EX-ZR300 | SL30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2012 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 40 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL30 over the Casio EX-ZR300
| SL30 | EX-ZR300 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung SL30
| EX-ZR300 | SL30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SL30 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR300 has got outside dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL30 has measurements of 94mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Samsung SL30 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR300 compared to the SL30.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR300 and SL30 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SL30 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to see the gap between sensor measurements only by reviewing specs. The graphic below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR300 and SL30.
All in all, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR300 to offer greater detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics far more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR300 is going to have an edge in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SL30 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SL30 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung SL30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung SL30 |
| Also Known as | - | ES15 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-05-22 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) | 140 grams (0.31 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 94 x 61 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $329 | $93 |