Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SL820
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43


94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SL820 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched May 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 168g - 95 x 59 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Additionally referred to as IT100

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SL820 Overview
Following is a comprehensive analysis of the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung SL820, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and SL820 (12MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR300 was announced 3 years after the SL820 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the EX-ZR300 matches up vs the SL820 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SL820 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 and Samsung SL820. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery and Samsung SL820 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Samsung SL820
EX-ZR300 | SL820 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2012 | ![]() | February 2009 | More modern by 40 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL820 over the Casio EX-ZR300
SL820 | EX-ZR300 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung SL820
EX-ZR300 | SL820 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SL820 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR300 comes with external dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung SL820 has measurements of 95mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung SL820 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at the time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR300 against the SL820.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR300 and SL820 is 92 and 94 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SL820 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes merely by viewing specs. The pic below should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR300 and SL820.
All in all, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You should expect to see the Casio EX-ZR300 to render more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR300 provides an edge in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SL820 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SL820 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung SL820 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung SL820 |
Otherwise known as | - | IT100 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-05-22 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.4-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205g (0.45 pounds) | 168g (0.37 pounds) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 95 x 59 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $329 | $280 |