Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL205
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
94 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL205 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released May 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Also Known as PL100
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL205 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL205, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Casio and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and TL205 (12MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR300 was introduced 2 years later than the TL205 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR300 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL205 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a short summary of how the EX-ZR300 grades versus the TL205 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL205 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Samsung TL205. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Samsung TL205 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Samsung TL205
| EX-ZR300 | TL205 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2012 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 29 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL205 over the Casio EX-ZR300
| TL205 | EX-ZR300 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung TL205
| EX-ZR300 | TL205 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL205 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR300 offers exterior dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung TL205 has measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL205 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR300 against the TL205.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR300 and TL205 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL205 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizing simply by checking specs. The visual below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR300 and TL205.
All in all, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different resolution. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR300 to give you extra detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR300 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL205 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL205 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung TL205 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung TL205 |
| Otherwise known as | - | PL100 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2012-05-22 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | 177 grams (0.39 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, SD/SDHC Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $329 | $180 |