Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic FZ2500
69 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34
53 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-896mm (F3.4-5.7) lens
- 485g - 117 x 78 x 93mm
- Introduced August 2012
- Succeeded the Olympus SP-820UZ
- Later Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Succeeded the Panasonic FZ1000
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic FZ2500, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the SP-820UZ (14MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the SP-820UZ (1/2.3") and FZ2500 (1") offer different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SP-820UZ was announced 5 years before the FZ2500 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SP-820UZ being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the SP-820UZ scores versus the FZ2500 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The whole galleries are available at Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery and Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-820UZ over the Panasonic FZ2500
SP-820UZ | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus SP-820UZ
FZ2500 | SP-820UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | August 2012 | Fresher by 49 months | |
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 460k | Crisper screen (+580k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-820UZ and Panasonic FZ2500
SP-820UZ | FZ2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-820UZ has got physical dimensions of 117mm x 78mm x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") and a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ2500 has dimensions of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") accompanied by a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic FZ2500 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the SP-820UZ vs the FZ2500.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the SP-820UZ and FZ2500 is 69 and 53 respectively.
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizing purely by seeing technical specs. The photograph here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-820UZ and FZ2500.
As you can tell, the two cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The SP-820UZ using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Panasonic FZ2500 will provide more detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The older SP-820UZ will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2012-08-21 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 22-896mm (40.7x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.7 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 15.00 m | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 180 (30, 240 fps) | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 485g (1.07 pounds) | 915g (2.02 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 78 x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $299 | $998 |