Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sony W730
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Portability
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sony W730 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched May 2012
Sony W730
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-224mm (F3.3-6.3) lens
- 122g - 93 x 52 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sony W730 Overview
The following is a thorough comparison of the Casio EX-ZR300 and Sony W730, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Sony. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the W730 (16MP) is fairly similar and they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR300 was unveiled 7 months earlier than the W730 so they are of a similar age. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a quick view of how the EX-ZR300 matches up vs the W730 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sony W730 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W730. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Sony W730 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Sony W730
| EX-ZR300 | W730 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W730 over the Casio EX-ZR300
| W730 | EX-ZR300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | May 2012 | Newer by 7 months |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Sony W730
| EX-ZR300 | W730 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sony W730 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR300 features outside measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Sony W730 has proportions of 93mm x 52mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.9") along with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR300 and Sony W730 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR300 and the W730.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR300 and W730 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sony W730 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing specifications. The image below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR300 and W730.
To sum up, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical resolution so you can expect similar quality of photographs although you may want to consider the launch date of the products into consideration. The more aged EX-ZR300 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sony W730 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Portrait photography details
Sony W730 Portrait photography details
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
supports face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Street photography highlights
Sony W730 Street photography highlights
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (205 grams)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with touch focus
lighter than competition in class (122g)
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 as a Sports photography camera
Sony W730 as a Sports photography camera
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
supports tracking autofocus
better than average battery power (500 per charge)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
max fps very slow (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR300
Travel photography with Sony W730
better than average battery power (500 shots)
lighter than competition in class (205g)
megapixel count good (16MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (24mm)
great zoom (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
doesn't have selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lighter than competition in class (122 grams)
comes with touch focus
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony W730 as a Landscape photography camera
has manual focus
quite wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
better than average battery power (500 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
lack of Time Lapse function
pretty wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
manual mode not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Casio EX-ZR300
Vlogging with Sony W730
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (205g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
lack of external mic port
pretty wide (25mm)
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focusing
lighter than competition in class (122g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have microphone jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sony W730 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W730 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W730 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-05-22 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-224mm (9.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 2s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 2.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) | 122 gr (0.27 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 93 x 52 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photographs | 240 photographs |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $329 | $138 |