Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm JV200
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Portability
96 Imaging
37 Features
18 Overall
29
96 Imaging
37 Features
18 Overall
29
Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm JV200 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched January 2013
FujiFilm JV200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 125g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
- Released January 2011
- Alternate Name is FinePix JV205
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm JV200 Overview
The following is a thorough review of the Casio EX-ZR400 versus FujiFilm JV200, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and FujiFilm. The resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the JV200 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-ZR400 was introduced 2 years after the JV200 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-ZR400 matches up versus the JV200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm JV200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & FujiFilm FinePix JV200. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & FujiFilm JV200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the FujiFilm JV200
| EX-ZR400 | JV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 26 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm JV200 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| JV200 | EX-ZR400 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and FujiFilm JV200
| EX-ZR400 | JV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm JV200 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR400 comes with outer measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the FujiFilm JV200 has measurements of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR400 versus FujiFilm JV200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR400 against the JV200.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and JV200 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm JV200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to envision the difference in sensor dimensions only by checking out specs. The pic here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR400 and JV200.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR400 to show more detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR400 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm JV200 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Portrait photography features
FujiFilm JV200 Portrait photography features
has manual focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
megapixel count decent (14MP)
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Street photography features
FujiFilm JV200 Street photography features
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (205g)
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
lighter than others (125g)
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Sports photography highlights
FujiFilm JV200 Sports photography highlights
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
fast continuous shooting (30.0 frames per second)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
includes tracking focus
great battery life (500 CIPA)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
has tracking focus
low max shutter speed (1/1,400s)
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
low battery pack (180 per charge)
lacks phase detect auto focus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Travel photography with FujiFilm JV200
great battery life (500 shots)
lighter than competitors (205 grams)
MP count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
missing Timelapse mode
does not feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
lighter than others (125g)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
low battery pack (180 per charge)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Landscape photography with FujiFilm JV200
has manual focus
really wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
great battery life (500 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
missing Timelapse mode
megapixel count decent (14MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
manual exposure not available
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
low battery pack (180 shots)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Vlogging advice
FujiFilm JV200 Vlogging advice
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors (205g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
missing microphone port
lighter than others (125g)
wide angle not the best (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have mic socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm JV200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | FujiFilm FinePix JV200 |
| Also called as | - | FinePix JV205 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2011-01-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 36-108mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 30.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | 180 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | AA |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD / SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $0 | $49 |