Casio EX-ZR400 vs Fujifilm XP200
Portability
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Fujifilm XP200 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed January 2013
Fujifilm XP200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Revealed March 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR400 vs Fujifilm XP200 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-ZR400 and Fujifilm XP200, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and FujiFilm. The resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR400 was revealed within a month of the Fujifilm XP200 so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the EX-ZR400 matches up against the Fujifilm XP200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR400 vs Fujifilm XP200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Fujifilm FinePix XP200. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Fujifilm XP200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Fujifilm XP200
| EX-ZR400 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| Fujifilm XP200 | EX-ZR400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 461k | Crisper screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Fujifilm XP200
| EX-ZR400 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | March 2013 | Similar age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Fujifilm XP200 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR400 features physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm XP200 has sizing of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") along with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR400 and Fujifilm XP200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR400 versus the Fujifilm XP200.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and Fujifilm XP200 is 92 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Fujifilm XP200 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes only by checking technical specs. The pic below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR400 and Fujifilm XP200.
As you can tell, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the exact same megapixels so you can expect similar quality of images although you should consider the launch date of the products into consideration.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Fujifilm XP200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Portrait photography features
Fujifilm XP200 Portrait photography features
manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
manual focus not available
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 as a Street photography camera
Fujifilm XP200 as a Street photography camera
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (205 grams)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Sports photography details
Fujifilm XP200 Sports photography details
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
fast shooting (30.0 frames per second)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
comes with tracking focus
better than average battery life (500 per charge)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
has tracking focus
environment proofing
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Travel photography with Fujifilm XP200
better than average battery life (500 shots)
lighter than others (205g)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
great zoom (300mm)
missing Timelapse mode
does not posses selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.0)
environment proofing
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.9)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 as a Landscape photography camera
Fujifilm XP200 as a Landscape photography camera
manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
better than average battery life (500 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
missing Timelapse mode
reasonably wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
environment proofing
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
manual mode not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
does not have Timelapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Vlogging advice
Fujifilm XP200 Vlogging advice
fairly wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others (205g)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
does not posses selfie friendly display
missing microphone support
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have microphone socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Fujifilm XP200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2013-03-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.9-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 30.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) | 232 grams (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | NP-50A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $0 | $250 |