Casio EX-ZR400 vs Kodak M580
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
90 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Kodak M580 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 59 x 56mm
- Revealed July 2009
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR400 vs Kodak M580 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Casio EX-ZR400 and Kodak M580, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Kodak. The resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the M580 (14MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR400 was brought out 3 years later than the M580 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a full comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the EX-ZR400 grades against the M580 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR400 vs Kodak M580 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Kodak EasyShare M580. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Kodak M580 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Kodak M580
| EX-ZR400 | M580 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 43 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M580 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| M580 | EX-ZR400 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Kodak M580
| EX-ZR400 | M580 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Kodak M580 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR400 features external measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Kodak M580 has dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR400 and Kodak M580 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR400 against the M580.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR400 and M580 is 92 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Kodak M580 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to envision the difference between sensor measurements purely by reading through technical specs. The photograph here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR400 and M580.
As you have seen, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR400 to give greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR400 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Kodak M580 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Kodak M580 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Kodak EasyShare M580 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Kodak EasyShare M580 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2009-07-29 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 30.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) | 150 gr (0.33 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 59 x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | KLIC-7006 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $0 | $169 |