Casio EX-ZR400 vs Kodak Sport
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
92 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Kodak Sport Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR400 vs Kodak Sport Overview
Following is a detailed analysis of the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Kodak Sport, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Kodak. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and Sport (12MP) but they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR400 was announced 2 years after the Sport which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the EX-ZR400 grades vs the Sport with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR400 vs Kodak Sport Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Kodak EasyShare Sport. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Kodak Sport Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Kodak Sport
| EX-ZR400 | Sport | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 26 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.6") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 112k | Clearer display (+349k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Sport over the Casio EX-ZR400
| Sport | EX-ZR400 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Kodak Sport
| EX-ZR400 | Sport | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Kodak Sport Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR400 comes with external measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Kodak Sport has dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Kodak Sport in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR400 compared to the Sport.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and Sport is 92 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Kodak Sport Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by checking out specs. The image below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR400 and Sport.
All in all, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should anticipate the Casio EX-ZR400 to provide greater detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR400 provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Kodak Sport Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Kodak Sport Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Kodak EasyShare Sport | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Kodak EasyShare Sport |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2011-01-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1250 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.4" |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 112 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 30.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | 175 grams (0.39 lb) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $155 |