Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus FE-47
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
93 Imaging
36 Features
17 Overall
28
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus FE-47 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-180mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 204g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Launched January 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus FE-47 Overview
Following is a comprehensive assessment of the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus FE-47, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the FE-47 (14MP) is relatively close and both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR400 was manufactured 3 years after the FE-47 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the EX-ZR400 matches up versus the FE-47 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus FE-47 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Olympus FE-47. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Olympus FE-47 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Olympus FE-47
| EX-ZR400 | FE-47 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 38 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-47 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| FE-47 | EX-ZR400 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus FE-47
| EX-ZR400 | FE-47 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus FE-47 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR400 offers external measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Olympus FE-47 has sizing of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus FE-47 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR400 and the FE-47.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and FE-47 is 92 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus FE-47 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes merely by viewing specifications. The pic here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR400 and FE-47.
To sum up, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR400 to render greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR400 provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus FE-47 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus FE-47 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus FE-47 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus FE-47 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 36-180mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 30.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) | 204 grams (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $0 |