Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
89 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Released January 2013
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Overview
Here, we are matching up the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Olympus SZ-16 iHS, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the SZ-16 iHS (16MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR400 was launched within a month of the SZ-16 iHS which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple overview of how the EX-ZR400 matches up against the SZ-16 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Olympus SZ-16 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
EX-ZR400 | SZ-16 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Casio EX-ZR400
SZ-16 iHS | EX-ZR400 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus SZ-16 iHS
EX-ZR400 | SZ-16 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | January 2013 | Similar generation | |
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR400 has physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus SZ-16 iHS has proportions of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Olympus SZ-16 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR400 and the SZ-16 iHS.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR400 and SZ-16 iHS is 92 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to visualise the difference between sensor measurements merely by looking at specifications. The photograph here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR400 and SZ-16 iHS.
Plainly, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same MP therefore you should expect similar quality of files though you really should consider the production date of the products into consideration.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus SZ-16 iHS |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 30.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205g (0.45 pounds) | 226g (0.50 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | 220 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $0 | $230 |