Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus 7010
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43


94 Imaging
34 Features
18 Overall
27
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus 7010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 145g - 98 x 56 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Also referred to as mju 7010

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus 7010 Overview
Following is a extensive analysis of the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Olympus 7010, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Olympus. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and 7010 (12MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR400 was unveiled 3 years after the 7010 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-ZR400 grades against the 7010 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus 7010 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Olympus Stylus 7010. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Olympus 7010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Olympus 7010
EX-ZR400 | 7010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 43 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 7010 over the Casio EX-ZR400
7010 | EX-ZR400 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus 7010
EX-ZR400 | 7010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus 7010 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR400 offers external dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus 7010 has measurements of 98mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 145 grams (0.32 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Olympus 7010 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR400 vs the 7010.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and 7010 is 92 and 94 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus 7010 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes purely by viewing technical specs. The pic underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR400 and 7010.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should anticipate the Casio EX-ZR400 to provide you with greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR400 should have an advantage in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus 7010 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus 7010 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus Stylus 7010 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus Stylus 7010 |
Also called as | - | mju 7010 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2009-07-22 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-196mm (7.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 30.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205g (0.45 pounds) | 145g (0.32 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 98 x 56 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $0 | $200 |