Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus 6000
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus 6000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Other Name is mju Tough 6000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus 6000 Overview
The following is a detailed overview of the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Olympus 6000, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Olympus. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and 6000 (10MP) but they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR400 was brought out 3 years after the 6000 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise overview of how the EX-ZR400 grades vs the 6000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus 6000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Olympus Stylus Tough 6000. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Olympus 6000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Olympus 6000
| EX-ZR400 | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 44 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| 6000 | EX-ZR400 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus 6000
| EX-ZR400 | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus 6000 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR400 has got outer measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus 6000 has proportions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Olympus 6000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR400 and the 6000.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR400 and 6000 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus 6000 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to picture the gap between sensor dimensions only by going over a spec sheet. The image underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR400 and 6000.
Clearly, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should expect to see the Casio EX-ZR400 to offer you more detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR400 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus 6000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 |
| Also called as | - | mju Tough 6000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2013-01-29 | 2009-07-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 50 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 1/4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lb) | 179 gr (0.39 lb) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $0 | $259 |