Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZR3

Portability
68
Imaging
60
Features
93
Overall
73
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
26
Overall
32

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZR3 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Released September 2016
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M1
  • Updated by Olympus E-M1 III
Panasonic ZR3
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 159g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
  • Revealed January 2010
  • Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-ZX3
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZR3 Overview

Here, we are contrasting the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZR3, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and ZR3 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and ZR3 (1/2.3") boast different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-M1 II was manufactured 6 years later than the ZR3 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZR3 being a Compact camera.

Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-M1 II matches up vs the ZR3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic ZR3

 E-M1 II ZR3 
RevealedSeptember 2016January 2010Fresher by 81 months
Manually focus More exact focusing
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1037k230kSharper display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR3 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 ZR3 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic ZR3

 E-M1 II ZR3 

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZR3 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to carry your camera often, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II offers outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Panasonic ZR3 has proportions of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZR3 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the ZR3.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZR3 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and ZR3 is 68 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZR3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZR3 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reviewing specifications. The graphic below will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and ZR3.

Plainly, both of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer extra detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZR3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZR3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZR3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic ZR3 as a Portrait photography camera
76
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focusing
saves RAW formats
28
MP count decent (14MP)
manual focus not available
no manual mode
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography details
Panasonic ZR3 Street photography details
78
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
has focus by touch
weather proof
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
very good high ISO (25,600)
57
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography info
Panasonic ZR3 Sports photography info
75
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
silent shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
fast shooting (60.0 fps)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
weather proof
has phase detect AF
not so great battery (350 CIPA)
37
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
max shutter speed is low (1/1,300 seconds)
low frames per second (2.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography highlights
Panasonic ZR3 Travel photography highlights
72
lighter than competition in class (574g)
weather proof
has focus by touch
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
screen is selfie friendly
not so great battery (350 shots)
65
MP count decent (14MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
no Time Lapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.3)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic ZR3 as a Landscape photography camera
76
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
no anti aliasing filter
very good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW formats
weather proof
has double storage slots
not so great battery (350 shots)
37
reasonably wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (14MP)
manual focus not available
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
tiny screen (2.7")
no manual mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
no Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M1 II
Vlogging with Panasonic ZR3
79
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detect focusing
high res video (4096 x 2160 pixels)
has microphone port
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
29
reasonably wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external mic jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZR3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic ZR3
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIPanasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3
Other name - Lumix DMC-ZX3
Type Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Released 2016-09-19 2010-01-26
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII Venus Engine HD II
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 25600 6400
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW photos
Minimum boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 121 11
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-200mm (8.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.3-5.9
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 1,037k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000s 1/1300s
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shooting speed 60.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 5.30 m
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video format MOV, H.264 AVCHD Lite
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574 grams (1.27 lbs) 159 grams (0.35 lbs)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 shots -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLH-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots 2 Single
Price at launch $1,700 $280