Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus 6020
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 6020
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus 6020, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and 6020 (13MP) but they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR400 was announced 3 years after the 6020 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-ZR400 grades vs the 6020 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Olympus 6020
EX-ZR400 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | February 2010 | Newer by 37 months | |
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Casio EX-ZR400
6020 | EX-ZR400 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus 6020
EX-ZR400 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither comes with Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR400 comes with external dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus 6020 has specifications of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus 6020 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR400 compared to the 6020.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR400 and 6020 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading through technical specs. The pic below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR400 and 6020.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Casio EX-ZR400 to give extra detail with its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos much more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR400 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
Also referred to as | - | mju Tough 6020 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Released | 2013-01-29 | 2010-02-02 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 1/4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 30.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205g (0.45 pounds) | 122g (0.27 pounds) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $0 | $279 |