Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax K-500
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a426/9a4260754748d1d18e1d86724961ebe1d9136dca" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL8 front Olympus PEN E-PL8 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7664a/7664a04951cdb8a34b9dfe4c6285125ada24205c" alt="Pentax K-500 front Pentax K-500 front"
64 Imaging
58 Features
70 Overall
62
Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax K-500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Announced September 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PL7
- Renewed by Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 51600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 646g - 130 x 97 x 71mm
- Launched November 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax K-500 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-PL8 and Pentax K-500, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the E-PL8 (16MP) and the K-500 (16MP) is fairly similar but the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and K-500 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-PL8 was launched 2 years after the K-500 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-500 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-PL8 grades vs the K-500 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax K-500 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL8 & Pentax K-500. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery & Pentax K-500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Pentax K-500
E-PL8 | K-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | ![]() | November 2013 | Newer by 35 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 921k | Crisper display (+116k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-500 over the Olympus E-PL8
K-500 | E-PL8 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Pentax K-500
E-PL8 | K-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax K-500 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL8 features outer dimensions of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") having a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-500 has proportions of 130mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") along with a weight of 646 grams (1.42 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PL8 and Pentax K-500 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-PL8 and the K-500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/500c9/500c99773f64484a1e8b461b22d688bdcf6cc0bd" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax K-500 size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax K-500 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL8 and K-500 is 86 and 64 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73855/73855e4882f6f33b9adae21d6d8ef52489e12c27" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax K-500 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax K-500 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax K-500 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing technical specs. The picture here should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL8 and K-500.
As you can tell, both of these cameras posses the exact same resolution but different sensor dimensions. The E-PL8 features the tinier sensor which will make obtaining shallower depth of field more challenging. The fresher E-PL8 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/558b1/558b1a2f9b8fd406b462684c2eac2edde988b9b0" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax K-500 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax K-500 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax K-500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65cb7/65cb77d28011b1a2ce4a9e713a04f1d32947b235" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax K-500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax K-500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax K-500 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Pentax K-500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Pentax K-500 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2013-11-27 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | PRIME M |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 51600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD monitor with brightness/color adjustment and AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/6000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync, Slow Sync+Redeye, Trailing Curtain Sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50,30,25,24 fps), 640 x 424 (30,25,24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 357g (0.79 lbs) | 646g (1.42 lbs) |
Dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 130 x 97 x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1087 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 710 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | AA |
Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $500 | $600 |