Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX3
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffbde/ffbdefa3dbaa016a21238d3a965f28734e1b3ffe" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b47f9/b47f930de28b117873fba531eee680f0fd88065c" alt="Ricoh CX3 front Ricoh CX3 front"
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Casio EX-ZR400 and Ricoh CX3, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Casio and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and CX3 (10MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The EX-ZR400 was announced 2 years later than the CX3 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-ZR400 matches up versus the CX3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Ricoh CX3. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Ricoh CX3
EX-ZR400 | CX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | June 2010 | Fresher by 32 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Casio EX-ZR400
CX3 | EX-ZR400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 461k | Clearer screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Ricoh CX3
EX-ZR400 | CX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR400 features external dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Ricoh CX3 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR400 and Ricoh CX3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR400 against the CX3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d3e0/4d3e0a050746b991972540366fab91ea38324670" alt="Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX3 size comparison Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX3 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and CX3 is 92 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e312c/e312c53c91dec3d50baed5c03500651a0465754e" alt="Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX3 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX3 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing purely by going over specs. The graphic underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR400 and CX3.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR400 to offer you more detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR400 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b63c7/b63c702e8f4ef2ed52b130b5fa610f0fcabb921e" alt="Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX3 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX3 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/079c7/079c7f708ea82d7bce11ce862cc8fc178d96d6da" alt="Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Ricoh CX3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Ricoh CX3 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-01-29 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 461k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) | 206 gr (0.45 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $0 | $329 |