Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX4
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Released August 2010
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX4, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Casio and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and CX4 (10MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR400 was launched 2 years after the CX4 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the EX-ZR400 matches up against the CX4 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Ricoh CX4. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Ricoh CX4
| EX-ZR400 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | August 2010 | Newer by 30 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| CX4 | EX-ZR400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 461k | Crisper display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Ricoh CX4
| EX-ZR400 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR400 comes with physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Ricoh CX4 has sizing of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX4 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR400 and the CX4.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and CX4 is 92 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to envision the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading technical specs. The pic underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR400 and CX4.
As you have seen, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Casio EX-ZR400 to offer you extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR400 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Ricoh CX4 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-01-29 | 2010-08-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 30.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $0 | $211 |