Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX4
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Released August 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX4, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Casio and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and CX4 (10MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR400 was launched 2 years after the CX4 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the EX-ZR400 matches up against the CX4 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Ricoh CX4. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Ricoh CX4
| EX-ZR400 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | August 2010 | Newer by 30 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| CX4 | EX-ZR400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 461k | Crisper display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Ricoh CX4
| EX-ZR400 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR400 comes with physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Ricoh CX4 has sizing of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX4 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR400 and the CX4.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and CX4 is 92 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to envision the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading technical specs. The pic underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR400 and CX4.
As you have seen, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Casio EX-ZR400 to offer you extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR400 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Ricoh CX4 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-01-29 | 2010-08-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 30.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $0 | $211 |