Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung EX2F
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Introduced December 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung EX2F, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and EX2F (12MP) and the EX-ZR400 (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") feature different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR400 was brought out 2 months later than the EX2F which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the EX-ZR400 matches up versus the EX2F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Samsung EX2F. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung EX2F
| EX-ZR400 | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 0k | Sharper display (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Casio EX-ZR400
| EX2F | EX-ZR400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung EX2F
| EX-ZR400 | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | December 2012 | Same age |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR400 enjoys external measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung EX2F has proportions of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung EX2F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR400 against the EX2F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR400 and EX2F is 92 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizing simply by seeing specifications. The visual here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR400 and EX2F.
To sum up, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-ZR400 due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Casio EX-ZR400 will produce more detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos far more aggressively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung EX2F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung EX2F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2012-12-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/1.4-2.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | AMOLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 30.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) | 294 gr (0.65 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 48 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 209 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $0 | $478 |