Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released January 2013
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Released August 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Overview
Below is a detailed overview of the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the Galaxy Camera 3G (16MP) is very comparable and they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR400 was revealed 6 months later than the Galaxy Camera 3G which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the EX-ZR400 matches up against the Galaxy Camera 3G in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
| EX-ZR400 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 0k | Sharper display (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G over the Casio EX-ZR400
| Galaxy Camera 3G | EX-ZR400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 4.8" |  | 3" | Larger display (+1.8") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
| EX-ZR400 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | August 2012 | Same age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR400 enjoys exterior dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G has specifications of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") having a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have during that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR400 and the Galaxy Camera 3G.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR400 and Galaxy Camera 3G is 92 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to imagine the difference in sensor measurements only by going through specifications. The photograph here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR400 and Galaxy Camera 3G.
To sum up, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact resolution therefore you can expect comparable quality of files although you may want to consider the launch date of the cameras into account.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Portrait photography advice
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Portrait photography advice
has manual focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Street photography advice
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Street photography advice
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (205g)
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (305g)
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Sports photography factors
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Sports photography factors
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
max frames per second high (30.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
includes tracking autofocus
better than average battery power (500 shots)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
great zoom range (23-481mm 20.9 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
no shutter priority
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Travel photography with Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
better than average battery power (500 CIPA)
lighter than others in class (205 grams)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
lighter than competition in class (305 grams)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
rather wide (23mm)
long reach (481mm)
good max aperture (f)
lack of Timelapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Landscape photography info
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Landscape photography info
has manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
better than average battery power (500 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse function
rather wide (23mm)
good max aperture (f)
bigger than average screen (4.8")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
lack of Timelapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Vlogging info
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Vlogging info
fairly wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others in class (205 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone socket
rather wide (23mm)
good max aperture (f)
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Optical)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition in class (305 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of microphone jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-01-29 | 2012-08-29 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | - |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 4.8" |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 0k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | 305 grams (0.67 lb) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $606 |