Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL220
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Portability
95 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
95 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL220 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released January 2013
Samsung TL220
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 169g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Released August 2009
- Alternative Name is ST500
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL220 Overview
The following is a complete review of the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Samsung TL220, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Samsung. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and TL220 (12MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR400 was manufactured 3 years after the TL220 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the EX-ZR400 matches up versus the TL220 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL220 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Samsung TL220. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Samsung TL220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung TL220
| EX-ZR400 | TL220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | August 2009 | Newer by 43 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL220 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| TL220 | EX-ZR400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung TL220
| EX-ZR400 | TL220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL220 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR400 enjoys physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung TL220 has proportions of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") having a weight of 169 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Samsung TL220 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR400 versus the TL220.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR400 and TL220 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL220 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by researching specs. The pic here may give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR400 and TL220.
All in all, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Casio EX-ZR400 to result in more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR400 should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL220 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Portrait photography with Samsung TL220
focusing manually
MP count good (16 megapixels)
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Street photography information
Samsung TL220 Street photography information
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (205 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
image stabilization (Optical)
features focus by touch
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sports photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Sports photography with Samsung TL220
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
max fps high (30.0 fps)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
has tracking focus
better than average battery life (500 per charge)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
image stabilization (Optical)
no shutter priority mode
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Travel photography details
Samsung TL220 Travel photography details
better than average battery life (500 shots)
lighter than competition (205 grams)
MP count good (16MP)
flash built-in
fairly wide (24mm)
very long reach (300mm)
does not have Timelapse function
does not posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
features focus by touch
built-in flash
rather wide (27mm)
missing Timelapse function
low resolution sensor (12MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Landscape photography details
Samsung TL220 Landscape photography details
focusing manually
fairly wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
better than average battery life (500 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
does not have Timelapse function
rather wide (27mm)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not available
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
missing Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Vlogging factors
Samsung TL220 Vlogging factors
fairly wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (205 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not posses selfie friendly display
does not have microphone support
rather wide (27mm)
has touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external microphone jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL220 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung TL220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung TL220 |
| Also called | - | ST500 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-01-29 | 2009-08-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 lbs) | 169g (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $0 | $90 |